The article examines the conditions required for producing knowledge for just urban sustainability. It highlights a need to review the current social organisation of knowledge within cities and the implications for academic practice – in other words, whose interests are being served? Whose knowledge claims are being supported and justified? The article considers how the knowledge practices of cities and universities often exacerbate urban problems that are perpetuated by a limited imaginary and selectivity. It is argued that a gap exists between the content of knowledge and the context of its application. What is required are new ways of practising collaborative research that do not compromise critique, but open it up to engagement with forms of knowledge that are currently excluded from the representations and categorisations that constitute dominant practices. By bringing the “what” and “how” of knowledge together in a process of active intermediation, it is possible to contribute to more just, sustainable urban futures for the many, not the few.
Perry, B., & May, T. (2010). Urban knowledge exchange: devilish dichotomies and active intermediation. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 1(1/2), 6. doi:10.1504/ijkbd.2010.032583
May, T. & Perry, B. (2011). Innovation and expertise: experiences from a formative evaluation. Conference abstract presented at the Second Berlin Forum Innovation in Governance Knowing Governance: The Making of Governance Knowledge and the Transformation of Politics, Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities. Berlin, Germany, 19-20 May 2011.
Platform: Sheffield-ManchesterType: Conference paper (peer-reviewed)Published year:
Perry, B. & May, T. (2015). Lessons from the research-practice relationship: from critique to co-production in Greater Manchester. In M. Polk (Ed.), Co-producing Knowledge for Sustainable Cities: Joining Forces for Change (98-122). Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge.
